Processing math: 0%

高纯~3He提取方法研究与比较

作者

作者. 高纯~3He提取方法研究与比较[J]. 同位素, 2000, 13(2): 78-78. DOI: 10.7538/tws.2000.13.02.0078
引用本文: 作者. 高纯~3He提取方法研究与比较[J]. 同位素, 2000, 13(2): 78-78. DOI: 10.7538/tws.2000.13.02.0078
Investigation and Comparison of ~3He Cleanup Methods[J]. Journal of Isotopes, 2000, 13(2): 78-78. DOI: 10.7538/tws.2000.13.02.0078
Citation: Investigation and Comparison of ~3He Cleanup Methods[J]. Journal of Isotopes, 2000, 13(2): 78-78. DOI: 10.7538/tws.2000.13.02.0078

高纯~3He提取方法研究与比较

详细信息
  • 中图分类号: TL922;;O552.33

Investigation and Comparison of ~3He Cleanup Methods

  • 摘要: 报道了采用 70 0℃铀床、77K低温活性炭柱提取高纯 3He,之后采用氢同位素稀释法除去 3He中微量氚的研究结果。 70 0℃流通式铀床和 77K低温活性炭柱吸附方法, 能快速除去 3He中杂质组分, 得到纯度大于 99.99%的高纯 3He;氢同位素稀释法能够将 3He中 3H摩尔分数降到低于 3.5×10 -10 %。与其他方法比较, 氢同位素稀释法工艺过程更加简单, 3He收率更高
    Abstract: He cleanup methods using uranium bed and active carbon absorption and then using hydrogen isotope dilution to elimination trace tritium are introduced. The results show that both U bed and active carbon absorption column are effective in 3He extraction. 3He gas with purity 99.99% is obtained using these methods and 3H mole fraction in 3He is reduced dowm to 3.5×10 -10 % using hydrogen isotope dilution. Comparing with the other methods, the U bed and hydrogen isotope dilution methods are more effective and simple in 3He cleanup and trace tritium elimination.
  • [1] Poitras JP.Tritium Remove From Gasses[R].ML M- 1389. 1967.
    [2] Wong KY,Hirircq B,Jalbert RA.Tritium Decontamination of Machine Components and Walls[J].Fusion Engineering and Design,1991,2 1:159~ 172.
    [3] 张伟, 陶精言.氚的生产 [M].北京: 原子能工业出版社, 1980
计量
  • 文章访问数:  261
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  914
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2000-03-26
  • 刊出日期:  2000-05-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回